SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Philart
PhilArt vs Profhilo – Polynucleotides Compared
May 1, 2025
Did you know that polynucleotides—originally studied for their role in genetic information storage—were later found to have powerful regenerative effects in skin treatments? Research shows that these molecules stimulate fibroblast activity, promoting tissue repair and improving skin elasticity, which has led to their growing use in aesthetic medicine.
Among today’s leading polynucleotide-based injectables, PhilArt and Profhilo stand out. While both aim to enhance skin hydration and texture, they differ in formulation, mechanism of action, and ideal treatment applications. Understanding these differences is key to choosing the most appropriate option based on individual skin needs.
In this article, we’ll compare PhilArt vs Profhilo, including their clinical indications, treatment protocols, and target patient profiles, to help you make a confident and informed decision.
Key Takeaways
- PhilArt is a polynucleotide-based injectable that focuses on skin regeneration, collagen stimulation, and tissue repair—making it ideal for delicate areas like the under-eyes.
- Profhilo improves skin hydration, elasticity, and firmness across larger facial zones with just two sessions, using a hyaluronic acid-based treatment.
- PhilArt delivers gradual, natural-looking improvements in skin texture, tone, and resilience, especially in fragile or early-aging areas.
- Profhilo offers fast, visible results in skin glow, plumpness, and tightness, making it a go-to option for patients seeking overall facial rejuvenation.
- The choice of treatment depends on the patient’s goals, skin condition, and the desired pace of results. In some cases, PhilArt and Profhilo can be combined for synergistic outcomes.
About: Trusted by over 2,000+ global clients since 2014, Maylips has become a leading supplier of cosmetic, skincare, and orthopedic products for medical and aesthetic professionals. Maylips offers a wide range of authentic brand-name products at competitive wholesale prices, sourced from around the world. If you’re looking to buy Croma Philart Fillers online, contact our sales team for guidance.
Differences in Composition and Mechanism Between PhilArt and Profhilo
PhilArt and Profhilo both aim to improve skin quality, but they differ significantly in composition and how they work at a cellular level. PhilArt is formulated with polynucleotides, including DNA fragments that actively stimulate tissue repair, enhance microcirculation, and promote fibroblast activity. It functions as a regenerative biostimulator, encouraging the skin to rebuild by triggering collagen and elastin production over time.
In contrast, Profhilo is composed of high and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid. It acts as a deep hydrator rather than a filler, spreading smoothly within the tissue to improve skin firmness, elasticity, and hydration through slow diffusion. While Profhilo also stimulates collagen and elastin, it doesn’t regenerate skin at the cellular level like polynucleotides.
Due to these differences, PhilArt is often preferred for fragile areas such as the under-eye zone, where volumizing treatments are risky. Profhilo works well for larger areas of skin laxity, like the cheeks or neck.
Clinical Indications and Treatment Protocols for PhilArt vs Profhilo
While both PhilArt and Profhilo are injectable skin boosters, their clinical applications serve distinct aesthetic purposes. Profhilo is primarily used to restore hydration, elasticity, and firmness, particularly in patients with age-related skin laxity or dullness. It’s ideal for clients seeking visible improvement in skin tone and texture across broader facial or body zones.
PhilArt, on the other hand, is a regenerative treatment that supports long-term skin health. It restores dermal structure, softens fine lines, and repairs post-inflammatory damage or sun-related skin stress. Its mechanism works more deeply to stimulate skin repair and regeneration rather than surface-level plumping.
Treatment protocols also differ:
- Profhilo typically requires two sessions spaced 4 weeks apart, with maintenance every 6–9 months.
- PhilArt often involves a series of 3–4 treatments spaced 2–3 weeks apart, especially for delicate areas like the periorbital zone or post-acne scars.
Your provider will determine the best schedule based on your skin’s needs, age, and response to stimulation.
Patient Profiles Best Suited for PhilArt vs Profhilo
Choosing the right treatment begins with understanding each patient’s skin type, concerns, and long-term goals. Here’s a closer look at which patients benefit most from each product:
PhilArt is an ideal choice for:
- Individuals with early signs of aging or textural changes in fragile skin areas like the eyes, temples, or neck.
- Patients who want to avoid dermal fillers but still address fine lines and dullness.
- Clients recovering from skin inflammation, scarring, or pigmentation issues.
- Anyone seeking natural regeneration without excessive volume or a drastic change in appearance.
Profhilo is better suited for:
- Those in their late 30s to 50s with signs of skin dehydration, sagging, or reduced elasticity in the face, neck, or hands.
- Patients looking for quick, noticeable improvements with minimal downtime and fewer sessions.
- Individuals who want a hydration-focused treatment rather than one targeting structural repair.
These profiles help guide treatment selection, especially when patients are unsure whether they need hydration, regeneration, or both.
Outcome Expectations and Product Selection: PhilArt or Profhilo?
When deciding between PhilArt and Profhilo, your ideal choice will depend on what you hope to achieve—and how quickly you expect results.
PhilArt provides gradual, regenerative improvement, particularly beneficial for patients with delicate skin or early aging. It strengthens dermal density, improves skin tone, and softens fatigue-related changes. Results emerge after two sessions, but the full effect is typically visible after three or more treatments. This is often seen in PhilArt before and after photos, which reveal smoother, brighter, and more refined skin without the volume typical of fillers.
Profhilo, on the other hand, offers a hydrating and lifting effect that becomes noticeable within a month. The treatment spreads across tissue to improve skin texture, firmness, and radiance without changing facial shape. Patients seeking a faster refresh or an “all-over glow” often favor Profhilo due to its simplicity and high satisfaction after just two sessions.
In essence:
- Choose PhilArt for fragile skin areas, long-term repair, and cellular-level rejuvenation.
- Choose Profhilo for visible hydration, skin tightening, and overall skin glow with minimal maintenance.
Conclusion
Both PhilArt and Profhilo are effective skin boosters, but they serve distinct roles in medical aesthetics. PhilArt stands out for its regenerative action, making it ideal for delicate or problem-prone areas like the under-eye region or areas with early aging signs. Meanwhile, Profhilo delivers deep hydration and improved skin firmness, especially across larger treatment zones, with the benefit of fewer sessions.
The best choice ultimately depends on the patient’s skin condition, aesthetic goals, and preference for treatment frequency. A consultation with a trained practitioner is essential to determine which injectable aligns best with individual needs—and in some cases, the two treatments can be strategically combined to maximize results.
FAQs
1. What is PhilArt made of?
PhilArt contains highly purified polynucleotides that support tissue regeneration and collagen production.
2. Is PhilArt safe for sensitive areas like under the eyes?
Yes, PhilArt is specifically designed for fragile zones such as the periorbital area.
3. How many sessions of PhilArt are typically needed?
Most patients require 3–4 sessions spaced about 2–3 weeks apart for optimal results.
4. Does PhilArt add volume like dermal fillers?
No, PhilArt is a biostimulator and does not add volume like hyaluronic acid fillers.
5. What can PhilArt treat besides under-eye concerns?
PhilArt is also used on the neck, décolletage, and hands to improve skin tone and texture.
6. How soon can I see results from PhilArt?
Some improvement is visible after the second session, with full results developing gradually over weeks.
7. Can PhilArt be combined with other treatments?
Yes, it’s often paired with other aesthetic procedures for more comprehensive skin rejuvenation.
References
Alvin W, Chan L, Lee A, et al. Polynucleotides in Aesthetic Medicine: A Review of Current Practices and Perceived Effectiveness. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(15):8224-8224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158224
Hakobyan K, Noble BB, Xu J. The current science of sequence-defined macromolecules. Progress in polymer science. 2023;147:101754-101754. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101754